Assignment2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Assignment2 - Essay utilizationJust when you think you have yourself figured issue you learn something new. Though no matter what a piece of paper with a bunch of numbers on it tells you, how someone really acts cannot be deflected on a piece of paper. When setting up the farinaceous, it took a little bit of time to figure out how exactly to execute the game in a way that it would cover the vast verities of personalities that are overspread among my group of friends. Sure, we have all play games together before, solely not for the purpose of analyzing the way that my friends personalities adjoin into the way that they strategically play a game. So, I decided to take a normal computer menu game, and add a twist to it. Phase 10 is a simple card game where the pretenders go around in a circle and pick up and discard cards and the hope to bang the phase that is required before another player goes out. It is usually a game played with several(prenominal) individuals competing toge ther, but instead, I broke my friends up into groups. Since there were 5 friends, one player had to play alone, release them at a disadvantage from the beginning. So I chose the friend who scored the highest in the assertive category, to canvass their aline assertiveness. Each group received the same amount of cards as each other and played the game as usual. Though, the team who came in last had to choose another player to eliminate. If the single player was eliminated, the team who won would have to divide and play individually. Now, within the game there are skim off cards, which allows a player to skip the next team, but what I allowed was the person who held the skip card could strategically skip which team they would like. This allows them to have some control of who has the ability to go out of cards first. I knew what I was pass into this expecting, the assertive person would do what they needed to win, and the people who saw the world as unfair would surly rant and rav e as they lose the game, the equalitarian would feel guilty make another player to lose, and the person with the high introspective score would over analyze the game a little too much. I myself did not participate in the game. I did not want to reorient the results, and boy am I glad that I did not play. The game started out as I had expected, but quickly the tables had turned. I might as well have thrown the personality test out the window, because when it came down to it, everyone was assertive. There was this competitive nature that came out in everyone and people where in the game to win it. I know that people do not like to lose, but it really move me how into the game people really had gotten. Usually when we play games together people are slightly competitive, but maybe it was because I was an outsider observing I had the chance to really see how things were. My friends who scored the lowest on the assertiveness section defiantly outshined the assertiveness of the friend w ho scored the highest. There wasnt one person who estimation of the game as treating them unfairly, or the world around them for that matter during the time the game was played. There were likewise people who I figured would over analyze the game and really think about everything that was going on and try to figure out others strategies, but that was not the case either. Everyone was so focused on winning that they paid more attention to what they needed to do, rather than focusing on what everyone else was doing. So, I knew that the